225 Walden St Property Information
Property Class
>8-UNIT-APT
State Class Code
112
Zoning (Unofficial)
C-2B
Map/Lot
204-150
Land Area (sq. ft)
160,810
Property Value
Year of Assessment 2025
Tax District C10
Residential Exemption No
Building Value $58,928,200
Land Value $36,674,600
Assessed Value $95,602,800
Sale Price $64,900,000
Book/Page 57797/389
Sale Date November 4, 2011
Previous Assessed Value $98,424,900
Owner Information
Owner(s) EQR-WALDEN PARK, LLC
Building Information
Commercial Building Number 1, Section 1 Exterior
Style APTS-LUXURY
Occupancy
>8-UNIT-APT
Number of Stories 6
Exterior Wall Type
BRICK
Roof Material
TAR-GRAVEL
Wall Height
12
Partititions
GOOD
Interior
Living Area (sq. ft.) 106,340
Number of Units
232
Systems
Heat Type HOT-WATER
Heat Fuel
Oil
Plumbing
GOOD
Condition & Grade
Year Built 1964
Overall Condition Good
Overall Grade Good-v-good
Subareas
Code
Description
Gross Area
Living Area
BAS
First Floor
16,360
16,360
F_5
Upper Finish 5 Stry
8,180
40,900
F_6
Upper Finish 6 Stry
8,180
49,080
UBM
Basement
8,180
0
Total:
40,900
106,340
Extra Features / Outbuildings
Description ELEV-PSNGR
Number of Units 2.00
Unit Type U
Commercial Building Number 2, Section 1 Exterior
Style APTS-LUXURY
Occupancy
>8-UNIT-APT
Number of Stories 6
Exterior Wall Type
BRICK
Roof Material
TAR-GRAVEL
Wall Height
10
Partititions
GOOD
Interior
Living Area (sq. ft.) 106,340
Number of Units
232
Systems
Heat Type HOT-WATER
Heat Fuel
Oil
Plumbing
AVERAGE
Condition & Grade
Year Built 1964
Overall Condition Very Good
Overall Grade Very-good
Subareas
Code
Description
Gross Area
Living Area
BAS
First Floor
16,360
16,360
F_5
Upper Finish 5 Stry
8,180
40,900
F_6
Upper Finish 6 Stry
8,180
49,080
UBM
Basement
8,180
0
Total:
40,900
106,340
Photos
(Click on a photo to view it at full size)
Sketches
(Click on a sketch to view it at full size)
This page contains much of the information used by the City of Cambridge to assess properties. The purpose of this information is to be used only for ad valorem taxation purposes and any other use is therefore not valid.